[Previous] | [ 3] | [Next]
E. Sirko, G. R. Knapp, J. Goodman, D. J. Schlegel, E. J. Knerr (Princeton University Observatory)
A sample of ~1000 Galactic halo blue horizontal branch (BHB) stars is drawn from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) spectroscopic database. Preliminary cuts in (u*-g*,g*-r*) distinguish candidate BHBs, which have a strong Balmer jump, from other halo stars. Surface-gravity indicators based on Balmer lines are further used to reject main sequence stars and blue stragglers: the D0.2 method (linewidths at 80% of the continuum) and the scalewidth-shape method (Clewley et al. 2002). After all three cuts, contamination by non-BHB stars is estimated to be less than 10% among stars brighter than g*=18. For fainter stars the linewidth analyses are unreliable, so a more stringent (u*-g*,g*-r*) cut is devised which, by comparison with the spectroscopically purified bright sample, is estimated to produce a contamination fraction of ~25% for 18< g* <20. Radial velocities and photometric distances are derived for the surviving stars. A maximum-likelihood method is used to determine the velocity ellipsoid of the halo. We find the velocity ellipsoid to be nearly isotropic with (\sigmar,\sigma\theta,\sigma\phi) = (99 ±3, 94 ±14, 118 ±18) \,\rm{km\,s-1} or (\sigmaR,\sigma\phi,\sigmaz) = (99 ±8, 116 ±18, 99 ±6) \,\rm{km\,s-1} in spherical and cylindrical coordinates, respectively. When the halo rotation and solar velocity are allowed to be free parameters, we also find v\rm{halo} = 7 ±18 \,\rm{km\,s-1} and (U, V, W) = (13 ±8, 228 ±13, -9 ±5) \,\rm{km\,s-1}. The halo parameters are robust with respect to variations in the errors assumed: photometric distance errors up to 0.5 mag, and velocity errors up to 30 \,\rm{km\,s-1}. Monte Carlo simulations validate the maximum likelihood technique. The conclusion that the radial component is as small as ~100 \,\rm{km\,s-1} is firm but contrasts with many previous studies based on halo stars in the solar neighborhood.
[Previous] | [ 3] | [Next]
Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 35 #4
© 2003. The American Astronomical Soceity.